From a4ebbb5986cd81342824655c853c6330425269d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Evan Teran Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:26:54 -0400 Subject: seems that NET_NAME_USER is more appropriate than NET_NAME_UNKNOWN adjusting patches Package-Manager: portage-2.2.8-r2 --- app-emulation/vmware-modules/files/271-3.17-00-netdev.patch | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'app-emulation/vmware-modules/files/271-3.17-00-netdev.patch') diff --git a/app-emulation/vmware-modules/files/271-3.17-00-netdev.patch b/app-emulation/vmware-modules/files/271-3.17-00-netdev.patch index 7c52455..e3ee3aa 100644 --- a/app-emulation/vmware-modules/files/271-3.17-00-netdev.patch +++ b/app-emulation/vmware-modules/files/271-3.17-00-netdev.patch @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ diff -rupN vmnet-only/netif.c vmnet-only.new/netif.c NULL_TERMINATE_STRING(deviceName); - dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof *netIf, deviceName, VNetNetIfSetup); -+ dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof *netIf, deviceName, NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, VNetNetIfSetup); ++ dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof *netIf, deviceName, NET_NAME_USER, VNetNetIfSetup); if (!dev) { retval = -ENOMEM; goto out; -- cgit v1.2.3-65-gdbad