| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9285
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662610
Thanks-To: Mike Auty
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* EAPI 7
* Drop py34
* Add py37
* Drop webapps
Inheriting webapps doesn't make sense. This isn't a webapp, it's a
library. Because django was abandoned before I took over maintenance, I
highly doubt that the package was used for anything serious, so there
isn't much to break by this removal.
The only thing that webapps did was copy admin media in some place for
easy HTTP static serving, but that isn't even what you would want to do
in a django webapp. You would rather run "collectstatic" on the whole
app and serve the result, which would include admin media, over HTTP.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support wine-mono-4.7.3
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support wine-mono-4.7.3
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support wine-mono-4.7.3
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Support wine-mono-4.7.3
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bump to 4.7.3
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As it is, this package is incompatible with cmake 3.12+. Let's document
that incompatibility until we fix the build.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/661860
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.44, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.43, Repoman-2.3.10
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks to Alex <maniac@pzskc383.dp.ua> for initial version of the
ebuild.
Gentoo-Bug: 651616
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|