summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* virtual/imagemagick-tools: keyword ~arm64Alexis Ballier2017-06-191-1/+1
| | | | Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.6, Repoman-2.3.2
* virtual/imagemagick-tools: keyword ~mipsAnthony G. Basile2017-06-171-1/+1
| | | | Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.5, Repoman-2.3.1
* Drop $Id$ per council decision in bug #611234.Robin H. Johnson2017-02-281-1/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
* virtual/imagemagick-tools: Add virtual for media-gfx/{image,graphics}magickDavid Seifert2017-02-112-0/+30
* Packages that do **not** link to either library and just consume the runtime command-line tools of either package should depend on the virtual in general. This reduces the complexity of the depgraph and makes central USE flag handling much easier. * Packages that can link to either imagemagick or graphicsmagick need more delicate handling in order to be usable with subslots. 1) Packages that **require** either imagemagick or graphicsmagick should use USE="graphicsmagick" to differentiate which one to use by specifying !graphicsmagick? ( media-gfx/imagemagick:= ) graphicsmagick? ( media-gfx/graphicsmagick:= ) 2) Packages that **may** use either imagemagick or graphicsmagick, but don't **require** it, should additionally add USE="imagemagick" and specify imagemagick? ( !graphicsmagick? ( media-gfx/imagemagick:= ) graphicsmagick? ( media-gfx/graphicsmagick:= ) ) So that the semantics become: USE="imagemagick" = "I want to build with optional imagemagick or graphicsmagick support" USE="-imagemagick" = "I do NOT want optional support for imagemagick and/or graphicsmagick" USE="-graphicsmagick" = "I want to build against media-gfx/imagemagick" USE="graphicsmagick" = "I want to build against media-gfx/graphicsmagick" This avoids package.use pollution due to setting REQUIRED_USE. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314431 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/3907