| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/650228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When using systemd, the Xserver does not need to run with root
privileges. Without systemd... I'm not sure.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/635102
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/635582
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/651286
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="sparc"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ia64"
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649392
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649564
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Needs xorg-proto keywording
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1.19.6 contains various regressions vs 1.19.5. Now that 1.20-rc1 is
in-tree, get rid of this version.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/646390
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/646450
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/647288
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Lets give suid-wrapper a try again...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Depends on randrproto-1.6.0 which is only available in xorg-proto.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix missing revision bump to propagate removing xf86rushproto
dependency. Otherwise, all systems with xorg-server installed can't be
upgraded to xorg-proto due to impossible blockers.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648926
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
xorg-proto does not install the printproto headers.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Once the individual x11-proto/ packages subsumed by xorg-proto are gone,
the x11-proto/ category will contain only xcb-proto, printproto (should
be tree cleaned) and xorgproto. That's not enough packages for a
category, so move xorgproto to x11-base/xorg-proto (with the hyphen to
match other packages in x11-base/).
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/7194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
rushproto hasn't been required since upstream commit 8ec79e05feac (in
2005!), and even then it wasn't actually needed!
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.3
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-r1 changed suid behavior, breaking some users for unknown reasons.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/635102
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/635582
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Glamor is used or required by many DDXs, so it is a sane default
Signed-off-by: Nick Sarnie <commendsarnex@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not even sure what this hardware is, and I don't see evidence of an
xf86-video-epson ever existing.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These were only in the tree for old versions of the nvidia-drivers,
which were removed in commit 075b72245180.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/623972
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/633910
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/635974
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.12, Repoman-2.3.3
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="hppa"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.8, Repoman-2.3.3
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="arm"
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-Bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/633910
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.11, Repoman-2.3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ernsteiswuerfel)
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.12, Repoman-2.3.3
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc ppc64"
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.12, Repoman-2.3.3
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ia64"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
suid-wrapper by default
suid-wrapper does the right thing
Signed-off-by: Nick Sarnie <commendsarnex@gmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5999
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Nick Sarnie <commendsarnex@gmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5780
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/611350
|