1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
|
From 3d4cf7de48a74726694abbaa09f9804b845ff3ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:18:30 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] build-sys: check for lz4 in the old and new numbering scheme
(#4717)
lz4 upstream decided to switch to an incompatible numbering scheme
(1.7.3 follows 131, to match the so version).
PKG_CHECK_MODULES does not allow two version matches for the same package,
so e.g. lz4 < 10 || lz4 >= 125 cannot be used. Check twice, once for
"new" numbers (anything below 10 is assume to be new), once for the "old"
numbers (anything above >= 125). This assumes that the "new" versioning
will not get to 10 to quickly. I think that's a safe assumption, lz4 is a
mature project.
Fixed #4690.
---
configure.ac | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 65eaae1ae..5979de4dc 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -621,10 +621,13 @@ AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_BZIP2, [test "$have_bzip2" = "yes"])
have_lz4=no
AC_ARG_ENABLE(lz4, AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-lz4], [disable optional LZ4 support]))
AS_IF([test "x$enable_lz4" != "xno"], [
- PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LZ4, [ liblz4 >= 125 ],
- [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LZ4, 1, [Define in LZ4 is available])
+ PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LZ4, [ liblz4 < 10 ],
+ [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LZ4, 1, [Define if LZ4 is available])
have_lz4=yes],
- have_lz4=no)
+ [PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LZ4, [ liblz4 >= 125 ],
+ [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LZ4, 1, [Define if LZ4 is available])
+ have_lz4=yes],
+ have_lz4=no)])
AS_IF([test "x$have_lz4" = xno -a "x$enable_lz4" = xyes],
[AC_MSG_ERROR([*** LZ4 support requested but libraries not found])])
])
--
2.11.0
|
GitWeb
