blob: e17447a77f4e840050e1c5fbb1db387b3296fda5 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
|
\summary{2015}{9}{13}
\agendaitem{Use flag policies}
\index{use flag!gtk}
References:
\begin{itemize}
\item
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/4775 (dead link)
\item
\url{https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Toolkit_USE_Flags\&oldid=362768}
\end{itemize}
On the topic of how to structure toolkit use flags, a lengthy
discussion with opposing viewpoints resulted. Consensus was that
manual intervention needed by REQUIRED_USE should be kept to a minimum,
and that users should not need to perform per-package useflag
micromanagement.
For approaching the problem systematically it was felt that we need
more information on the current in-tree use cases of the flags and
the objectives that we're actually trying to achieve by setting a policy.
dilfridge volunteered to collect use cases for toolkit use flags,
rich0 to formulate the objectives. Future discussion will focus on the
suitability of the different approaches.
\agendaitem{Projects without a lead, lead elections}
\index{projects!without lead}\index{projects!lead!election}
The wording of \glep{39} was found to be unclear if not confusing (it
states that a project "may have one or many leads", and that their
selection "must occur at least once every 12 months").
After discussion the following points were agreed upon:
\begin{itemize}
\item
The Gentoo Wiki project page template should be enhanced to show the
last lead election date for each project.
\item
The council sends an e-mail to the gentoo-project mailing list asking
projects to consider electing a lead and confirming her/him regularly.
\end{itemize}
\agendaitem{Bugs with council involvment}
\bug{503382}: Ulm started working on the 20131210 summary. No news otherwise.
\agendaitem{Open floor}
No topics were brought up.
|
GitWeb
