summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: 52960de0880b73455057e210820d63417eb95154 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
[22:02:03] <tampakrap> alexxy / bonsaikitten / dagger / jmbsvicetto / lxnay / mrpouet / reavertm_ / scarabeus / spatz / wired
[22:02:05] <tampakrap> meeting time
[22:02:12] <tampakrap> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/maintainers/meetings/meeting-2010-03-18;h=b056be61645fbd793cf07cb9d0eb968e961cb2c1;hb=HEAD
[22:02:21] <tampakrap> who is here?
[22:02:25] <dagger> mesa here
[22:02:29] <spatz> me
[22:02:39] <scarabeus> boss around
[22:02:44] <spatz> although my connection is flaky
[22:02:47] <leio> ping me when it gets to subprofile stuff I guess. Preoccupied 30 more mins
[22:03:00] <tampakrap> leio: i was about to ping me
[22:03:07] <tampakrap> ok let's skip it for now
[22:03:12] <tampakrap> s/me/you
[22:03:18] <leio> well, in that agenda it's last item anyway..
[22:04:11] <tampakrap> let's wait another 10 mins, many ppl are away
[22:04:31] -*- alexxy here ;)
[22:05:54] <scarabeus> I will start with the lighter thing
[22:06:00] <scarabeus> since there were no objections to new rules
[22:06:01] --> willikins (~rbot@gentoo/bot/Willikins) has joined #gentoo-meetings
[22:06:10] <tampakrap> woohaa bot is back
[22:06:13] <tampakrap> !herd kde
[22:06:16] <scarabeus> i will start enforcing them
[22:06:36] <tampakrap> where is the draft first of all?
[22:06:39] <scarabeus> so i will thin up team list probably
[22:06:40] <tampakrap> and why isn't it in git?
[22:06:52] <scarabeus> what for my rules?
[22:06:55] <scarabeus> i sent you mail
[22:07:06] <tampakrap> ok, commit it in git :)
[22:07:36] <scarabeus> http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/kde-team-rules.html
[22:08:04] <scarabeus> i would have to find that rst first :P
[22:08:15] <jmbsvicetto> pong
[22:08:28] <tampakrap> ok let's start now
[22:08:29] <jmbsvicetto> I just need a minute to put my things down and I'll be back
[22:08:34] <tampakrap> again who is here?
[22:08:51] <scarabeus> scarab
[22:09:09] -*- spatz ←
[22:09:09] <tampakrap> !herd kde
[22:09:26] <tampakrap> (it responds to pm at least)
[22:09:36] <tampakrap> <willikins> (kde) abcd, alexxy, carlo, cryos, dagger, deathwing00, jmbsvicetto, keytoaster, lxnay, mrpouet, patrick, scarabeus, spatz, sping, tampakrap, tgurr, wired
[22:09:57] -*- wired o/
[22:10:25] -*- alexxy partialy there or here or somwhere else
[22:11:09] <tampakrap> scarabeus: go on with the removal of members plz
[22:11:18] <tampakrap> what's the news on this?
[22:11:28] <scarabeus> well you didnt complain
[22:11:35] <scarabeus> so i will put down a list, and clean up
[22:11:46] <scarabeus> you had 1 month to write objections to my rules list :]
[22:12:14] <scarabeus> just to note, it has nothing against the named developers, i just preffer that people know who is maintaining it
[22:12:59] <jmbsvicetto> here
[22:13:02] <tampakrap> anything else on this?
[22:13:31] <scarabeus> only if you have questions
[22:13:58] <tampakrap> questions? anyone?
[22:14:52] <tampakrap> so, people are going to be removed from the team, i repeat: questions?
[22:15:13] <willikins> (kde) abcd, alexxy, carlo, cryos, dagger, deathwing00, jmbsvicetto, keytoaster, lxnay, mrpouet, patrick, scarabeus, spatz, sping, tampakrap, tgurr, wired
[22:15:38] <tampakrap> let's move on
[22:15:46] <tampakrap> Review work flow for KDE minor bumps and improve collaboration with arch teams
[22:15:49] <willikins> (kde) abcd, alexxy, carlo, cryos, dagger, deathwing00, jmbsvicetto, keytoaster, lxnay, mrpouet, patrick, scarabeus, spatz, sping, tampakrap, tgurr, wired
[22:15:51] <tampakrap> scarabeus: ^^?
[22:16:09] <scarabeus> it was written last time, wasn't it?
[22:16:56] <tampakrap> we were going to continue the discussion today
[22:17:10] <tampakrap> unless nothing new is going to be said
[22:17:14] <tampakrap> jmbsvicetto: ^^?
[22:17:39] <jmbsvicetto> tampakrap: iirc I had only one change and it was accepted
[22:18:42] <tampakrap> ok
[22:18:43] <tampakrap> next
[22:18:54] <tampakrap> KDE-4.4 status
[22:19:09] <tampakrap> 4.4.1 is out, you said that ppl reported problems with 4.4.0
[22:19:14] <tampakrap> i didn't have any at least
[22:19:22] <scarabeus> i saw few people working on bindings finaly in overlay
[22:19:25] <scarabeus> which is great
[22:19:41] <tampakrap> indeed
[22:19:57] <tampakrap> can we have 4.4.1 as a stable candidate? regressions? blockers?
[22:20:02] <jmbsvicetto> It's working great here
[22:20:10] <jmbsvicetto> I don't have kdepim or kdebindings, though
[22:20:28] <tampakrap> kdepim is great, kdebindings needs work
[22:20:40] <dagger> I've got full kde-4.4.1 and it's good. I had problems migrating from 4.3.x with kmail, but it's all ok now
[22:20:50] <tampakrap> i guess we should pay attention on this and if there are no further problems we can have it as a stable candidate
[22:21:02] <spatz> schedule?
[22:21:33] <wired> 4.4.1 works great here too - and on colleague's system as well (users are best test :P)
[22:21:50] <tampakrap> i guess start of next month? scarabeus?
[22:22:06] <scarabeus> ok, i saw no more issues too
[22:22:18] <scarabeus> just check regressions against 4.3 -> 4.4 migration
[22:22:19] <alexxy> фдыщ нуы
[22:22:23] <scarabeus> and ok for 4.4.1 patch
[22:22:24] <alexxy> yep
[22:22:31] <alexxy> 4.4.1 works great
[22:22:41] <alexxy> also we use it at university
[22:22:45] <alexxy> as De for students
[22:23:06] <tampakrap> scarabeus: start of next month is ok?
[22:23:25] <scarabeus> yup
[22:23:26] <spatz> meaning two weeks from now?
[22:23:36] <tampakrap> no, stable bug
[22:23:43] <tampakrap> sorry misread :P
[22:23:44] <tampakrap> yes
[22:24:14] <tampakrap> unless there aren't any other things here, we can move
[22:24:21] --> dilfridge (~quassel@gateway.maximilianeum.mhn.de) has joined #gentoo-meetings
[22:24:34] <tampakrap> enterprise useflag for kdepim stuff (a use flag to follow the enterprise branch of the kdepim repo, only for trunk)
[22:24:54] <scarabeus> nobody sent any mail or word about working on it
[22:24:58] <scarabeus> so we should move it to todo
[22:25:04] <scarabeus> until someone feels motivated enough
[22:25:04] <tampakrap> i lack the hardware to proceed on this, plus i asked for help, noone answered
[22:25:19] <tampakrap> Sput: anything you want to say on this?
[22:25:36] <dagger> i dont know anything about it, but would like to get some information. what's different in enterprise branch?
[22:26:04] <dagger> does enterprise branch contain support for Openchange/libmapi?
[22:26:27] <dagger> (that's required for propler M$ exchange 2003/2007/2010 support)
[22:26:31] <tampakrap> enterprise branch for kdepim is the actual branch were kde developers care about
[22:26:39] <tampakrap> since kdepim trunk is broken right now
[22:26:47] <dilfridge> it's supposed to stay stable while everything else is being ported to akonadi (and broken in the meantime)
[22:26:47] <scarabeus> dagger: it is the branch that is more stable/solid, developers care about that one, because they are payed for that branch
[22:27:14] <dagger> so I guess it's not part of "default" kdepim right?
[22:27:20] <tampakrap> ok, we'll move this topic for next meeting, since there is no progress
[22:27:22] <tampakrap> right
[22:27:50] <tampakrap> let's move
[22:27:52] <tampakrap> koffice status
[22:28:10] <tampakrap> new koffice is released, i did a simple rename, and it currently is in hilarious status
[22:28:18] <tampakrap> some packages don't even compile
[22:28:53] -*- scarabeus told you so
[22:29:04] <tampakrap> i'll try to fix it, but i'll need help, anyone willing to help me is welcome
[22:29:16] <wired> i might
[22:29:25] <tampakrap> current ebuilds are hardmasked in overlay, tarball is not released yet
[22:29:31] <wired> okie
[22:29:55] <tampakrap> and we should be quick on this and try to have a schedule for stabilization too
[22:30:17] <tampakrap> as it also new packages
[22:30:34] <wired> btw i can help with quick-ish stabilization on amd64
[22:30:42] <tampakrap> sure
[22:30:47] <Sput> tampakrap: enterprise branch is based on pre-akonadi kdepim and supposedly works
[22:30:56] <Sput> but a USE flag isn't gonna cut it, the packages are too different
[22:31:20] <Sput> also we might have to check what they have outside of kdepim, I think they even ship a hacked kdelibs
[22:31:26] <wired> o_O
[22:31:33] <wired> kdelibs-lite!
[22:31:34] <wired> ;p
[22:31:37] <Sput> (but Paul Adams told me it should work fine with 4.5)
[22:31:41] <tampakrap> yes, we need a different branch for this
[22:32:01] <Sput> there was a mail recently on kde-scm-interest where steveire detailed how branches work
[22:32:23] <Sput> kdepim is in the process of moving to git (as the rest of KDE)
[22:33:05] <Sput> in any case, the enterprise5 branch is going to be based on KDE 4.5, the enterprise4 branch is based on KDE 4.4
[22:33:47] <tampakrap> ok thanks i'm going to add those info in a mail and try to revive the issue to users
[22:34:19] <tampakrap> moving to next one
[22:34:19] <Sput> also, it seems like KDAB doubts that they manage to get kdepim fixed in time for KDE 4.5
[22:34:34] <Sput> there will be a meeting in a few weeks where they are going to decide what to do
[22:35:11] <Sput> one problem is that they got their branching all wrong and lost tons of commits for kmail trunk
[22:35:25] <Sput> because people were comitting to the wrong branch...
[22:35:45] <tampakrap> okie
[22:35:50] <tampakrap> next one
[22:35:56] <tampakrap> change kde-meta (and @kde-*) to include all modules (plus the developer specific ones)
[22:36:12] <tampakrap> there were some ppl in the mail i send that liked my idea
[22:36:21] <tampakrap> so i'd really like to move on this
[22:36:24] <tampakrap> scarabeus: ^^?
[22:36:29] <scarabeus> with useflag you can go ahead
[22:36:29] <wired> im still in favor of this if we use a USE flag
[22:36:31] <jmbsvicetto> I still don't like that
[22:36:49] <jmbsvicetto> At least not in kde-meta without a use flag
[22:36:51] <wired> dev || sdk
[22:36:59] <wired> both are nice use flags :)
[22:37:01] <scarabeus> jmbsvicetto: what i said above :P
[22:37:05] <jmbsvicetto> :P
[22:37:34] <tampakrap> ok, i'll add sdk useflag to kde-meta
[22:37:47] <tampakrap> and leave sets as they are
[22:37:52] <jmbsvicetto> not as IUSE default :P
[22:37:54] <tampakrap> i don't care about sets anyway
[22:37:58] <tampakrap> of course not
[22:38:00] <wired> lol
[22:38:02] <wired> +1
[22:38:27] <tampakrap> sdk will contain bindings, kdewebdev and kdesdk? or should i leave bindings for now?
[22:38:53] <wired> do they work?
[22:39:03] <scarabeus> they do not mostly]
[22:39:09] <wired> do they build?
[22:39:12] <tampakrap> there are ppl working on them, so i guess they will in the near future
[22:39:20] <dilfridge> scarabeus: which bindings do not work?
[22:39:31] <scarabeus> csharp afaik
[22:39:35] <wired> if they build i vote on adding them, get people's attention :)
[22:40:11] <tampakrap> ok, i'll leave them out for now then, and add them later when they all build
[22:40:24] <tampakrap> afaik we don't even have a meta for bindings
[22:41:19] <tampakrap> thank you for this, next one is patches of kde-packager
[22:41:32] <tampakrap> jmbsvicetto / ABCD(absent): any news on this?
[22:42:18] <jmbsvicetto> tampakrap: sorry not yet
[22:42:34] <tampakrap> so i guess you need help on this?
[22:42:39] <jmbsvicetto> I'll focus on this for 4.4.1 onwards
[22:42:40] <tampakrap> any more ppl willing to help?
[22:43:07] <scarabeus> i have to work on something different, so i have to blob out, so enjoy the rest  of the meeting, i will reply to pongs, but wont read
[22:43:07] <scarabeus> for latest topic i am with lieo (malformed for no highlight)
[22:44:10] <tampakrap> no worries
[22:44:15] <wired> scarabeus: is it something with leads that makes them be away all the time?
[22:44:20] <wired> :D
[22:44:27] <wired> j/k ofc, c ya later
[22:44:46] <tampakrap> let's raise the topic in next meeting to see if there will be any progress then
[22:45:05] <tampakrap> last topic and most important
[22:45:10] <tampakrap> split of desktop profile
[22:45:21] <tampakrap> leio / yngwin: your attention plz :)
[22:45:47] <yngwin> :)
[22:46:40] <tampakrap> leio: as i told you before, i really like the idea of mixed profiles and i am willing to work on it
[22:47:08] <jmbsvicetto> I like that idea as well
[22:47:11] <tampakrap> but i can't have an eta as i don't have a stable schedule atm and i don't even know how much time it wants to be finished
[22:47:16] <yngwin> me too, but i expect that will take a while to implement
[22:47:23] --> pesa (~Pesa@host124-126-dynamic.52-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) has joined #gentoo-meetings
[22:47:27] <tampakrap> so i'd really like to proceed on commiting the patches i have prepared
[22:47:50] <tampakrap> so any objections? something wrong with them before i commit?
[22:48:48] <yngwin> no objections
[22:49:38] <wired> i haven't tested them (and i don't use the desktop profile :p) but i really like the idea, +1
[22:51:06] <-- pesa (~Pesa@host124-126-dynamic.52-82-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) has left #gentoo-meetings ("Konversation terminated!")
[22:51:20] <tampakrap> leio seems away, so if you want you anything more you can pm me
[22:51:38] <tampakrap> i'll commit it this sunday fyi, i'll be out of town the next two days
[22:52:10] <leio> well, you know what I think
[22:52:26] <leio> (was here at start, but had a phone call afterwards)
[22:53:36] <tampakrap> cool, i'd take it as a :thumbup from the gnome team and proceed
[22:53:42] <leio> we have had the single desktop profile situation for, what? four years? So even waiting 3 months more to get the better method implemented would sound fine in my book, but as I can't work on that myself, I can't well argue against more subprofiles meanwhile
[22:55:00] <tampakrap> point taken
[22:55:32] <tampakrap> i guess the meeting is over, I'd also like to inform you i have updated docs, please check for any issues