blob: 932df9355a9970847429f47fe3ec7f3ca38f9c42 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
|
Causes SIGBUS on armv7 (at least in jiji's arm32-on-arm64 chroot) in Pandas test
suite. Unaligned access is UB anyway.
--- a/blosc/blosc-common.h
+++ b/blosc/blosc-common.h
@@ -43,28 +43,6 @@
*/
#if !defined(BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN)
#define BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__386) || defined (__amd64) /* GNU C, Sun Studio */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(__i486__) || defined(__i586__) || defined(__i686__) /* GNU C */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(_M_IX86) || defined(_M_X64) /* Intel, MSVC */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(__386)
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(_X86_) /* MinGW */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#elif defined(__I86__) /* Digital Mars */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-/* Seems like unaligned access in ARM (at least ARMv6) is pretty
- expensive, so we are going to always enforce strict alignment in ARM.
- If anybody suggest that newer ARMs are better, we can revisit this. */
-/* #elif defined(__ARM_FEATURE_UNALIGNED) */ /* ARM, GNU C */
-/* #undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN */
-#elif defined(_ARCH_PPC) || defined(__PPC__)
-/* Modern PowerPC systems (like POWER8) should support unaligned access
- quite efficiently. */
-#undef BLOSC_STRICT_ALIGN
-#endif
#endif
#if defined(__SSE2__)
|
GitWeb
