diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'decisions/summary-20070412.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | decisions/summary-20070412.tex | 97 |
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 49 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20070412.tex b/decisions/summary-20070412.tex index 5615b7a..75d05f4 100644 --- a/decisions/summary-20070412.tex +++ b/decisions/summary-20070412.tex @@ -1,89 +1,88 @@ \summary{2007}{4}{12} +Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{85c578debc4821504803755cd6756fb3} + \agendaitem{Code of Conduct} -\index{Code of Conduct} +\index{Code of Conduct}\index{project!proctors} -amne has been doing a good job putting the group together. -Ask proctors to address these two issues for next meeting: +\dev{amne} has been doing a good job putting the initial group of proctors +together. We ask the proctors to address these two issues for next meeting: \begin{itemize} \item - add a "mission" statement + add a "mission" statement, and \item - fix wording to have a positive spin + fix the wording to have a positive spin. \end{itemize} -\agendaitem{Sync Social Contract with Gentoo Foundation (external entities)} -\index{social contract}\index{trustees}\index{foundation!trustees} - -trustees will review the statement to clarify things and then - we'll look again at syncing - +\agendaitem{Splitting gentoo-dev mailing lists} +\index{mailing list!gentoo-dev}\index{project!proctors} +\index{mailing list!gentoo-dev-announce} -\agendaitem{Documentation for mail servers} +There was no real favorable backing for this idea. People don't like the -dev +mailing list because of the crap; splitting the lists will just move the crap +elsewhere, not really solving anything. -They are supposed to be finished in terms of content. -Wolf will look at getting them actually committed. +Let the proctors do their thing, and if need be, review this again. \agendaitem{PMS} \index{PMS} -Current status looks good in getting issues resolved. -Should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting. -Let the devs sort out the todo as the current work flow seems -to be getting things done finally - - -\agendaitem{Splitting gentoo-dev mailing lists} -\index{mailing list!gentoo-dev}\index{project!proctors} - -no real favorable backing for this +The current status looks good in getting open bugs resolved. It should be up and +running as git repository on Gentoo infrastructure by the next meeting.\footnote{Some +discussion arose about getting \dev{ciaranm} as non-developer commit access.} +Let the developers sort out the todo list as the current workflow seems +to be getting things done finally. -people dont like -dev because of the crap, splitting the lists - will just move the crap else where, not really solving anything +\agendaitem{Surveys} +\index{surveys} -let proctors do their thing and if need be, review this again +\dev{robbat2} will look at getting user / developer surveys in place after the +release of 2007.0. We should probably try and take fresh surveys after each +bi-annual release from now on to see if we are meeting many of users' desires. \agendaitem{Limiting of council powers} +\index{council!limiting powers} -There doesnt seem to be real backing for this from dev community or - the council itself - -If a majority of developers are truly upset/disturbed by a - council decision, it should show easily - -If you dont like a council member, dont vote for them next time +There doesnt seem to be real backing for this from dev community or the council +itself. If a majority of developers are truly upset / disturbed by a council +decision, it should show easily. If you dont like a council member, dont vote +for them next time. \agendaitem{Moving gentoo-core to public archives} -\index{mailing list!gentoo-core} +\index{mailing list!gentoo-core}\index{mailing list!gentoo-dev} -Many people dislike this moving forward +Many people dislike this moving forward. It is not going to happen at this time. +We should motivate people to use -dev over -core for most things.\footnote{The +official summary also contains ``Look into getting a dev-only archive finally.'', +however, there was no agreement on this in the log --- people see it as a potential +leak.} -Use -dev over -core for most things -Not going to happen at this time -Look into getting a dev-only archive finally +\agendaitem{New metastructure proposal} +This doesn't seem to address any of the problems it proposes to address.\footnote{The +topic likely refers to the \agoref{gentoo-dev}{69368b0ef5e30bdfe268a92338f5196e}.} -\agendaitem{Surveys} -\index{surveys} +A large majority of developers and users prefer the single tree development style +that Gentoo has versus many smaller trees. -robbat2 will look at getting user/dev surveys in place after the - release of 2007.0 -probably try and take fresh surveys after each bi-annual release -from now on to see if we're meeting many of users' desires +\agendaitem{Sync Social Contract with Gentoo Foundation (external entities)} +\index{social contract}\index{trustees}\index{foundation!trustees} + +The trustees will review the statement to clarify things and then +we'll look again at syncing.\footnote{No, the log is not much clearer.} -\agendaitem{New metastructure proposal} -Doesnt seem to address any of the problems it proposes to +\agendaitem{Documentation for the mail servers} -A large majority of developers and users prefer the single tree - development style that Gentoo has versus many smaller trees +The documentation is supposed to be finished in terms of content. +\dev{wolf31o2} will look at getting it actually committed. |