blob: ee82a851344d96e4e96df4784a0a0fd68907ab45 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
|
\summary{2011}{3}{8}
Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev-announce}{584dff0e703bf42242dded3ab3847404}
Agenda announcement: ---
\agendaitem{Preferring latest EAPI in ebuilds}
\index{EAPI!usage in ebuilds}\index{devmanual}
The following change should encourage developers to migrate their ebuilds to
latest EAPI version rather than sticking to old EAPIs.
\vote{Devmanual EAPI section will be updated so the new text reads:
``When writing new ebuilds developers can choose whathever EAPI they think is the
best. Using the features of the latest EAPI is encouraged.''}{Accepted with 6
yes votes.}
\agendaitem{Slacking arches}
\index{arches!slacking}
The ongoing discussion with arch teams has already provided some good feedback.
As we now have a better knowledge of the issues affecting arch teams, some of
the points raised will be moved to the -project mailing list to expose them to a
wider audience and to try to find solutions from the community.
Common issues identified so far are developer burnout and lack of hardware.
\dev{jmbsvicetto} is now coordinating between foundation / infra / arch teams
to see if we can define some hardware specs and get the required resources.
\agendaitem{GLEP 48 (QA)}
\index{project!qa}\index{project!devrel}
\index{commit access!suspension}
After a long discussion and a review of the final proposal text,\footnote{At the
now broken link https://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff} the result is
the following: 4 in favor, 3 didn't state (abstain)
Given the result, the \glep{48} update is accepted and can proceed, albeit
\dev{betelgeuse} raised a question how Devrel is going to work out the resolution
after the process is handled over from QA. It was agreed that the part of the text
(last sentence of the diff) will be updated with string based on what those two
teams agree with without more council involvment (unless required otherwise).
\footnote{Apparently this update never happened. In the raw log there are
concerns about devrel and QA disagreeing.}
\agendaitem{Open bugs with council involvement}
\bug{344479}: \dev{ferringb} is going to look to it and resolve it (given the
fact the bug is about him so he should do it :))
\agendaitem{Open floor}
\index{icecream}
People were really really quiet. Nobody wanted icecream.
|
GitWeb
