summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: f98c78845105bc09dbd2f9860f8c64cf2fe0c938 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
[2022-06-12T20:00:06+0100] <@sam_> hello
[2022-06-12T20:00:28+0100] <@sam_> !proj council 
[2022-06-12T20:00:33+0100] <willikins> sam_: (council@gentoo.org) dilfridge, gyakovlev, marecki, mattst88, mgorny, sam, ulm
[2022-06-12T20:00:30+0100] <@sam_> ding ding, it's meeting time!
[2022-06-12T20:00:35+0100] <@sam_> agenda: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/53643278744d66cba503c5f0397b08c3
[2022-06-12T20:00:49+0100] <@dionysos> yippi-ka-yay-yay
[2022-06-12T20:00:49+0100] <@sam_> 1. Roll call
[2022-06-12T20:00:50+0100] • sam_: here
[2022-06-12T20:00:57+0100] • ulm: here
[2022-06-12T20:00:57+0100] • dionysos: here
[2022-06-12T20:00:58+0100] • Marecki: here
[2022-06-12T20:01:01+0100] • gyakovlev: here
[2022-06-12T20:01:21+0100] • mattst88: here
[2022-06-12T20:01:23+0100] <+antarus> brb
[2022-06-12T20:01:22+0100] <@sam_> mgorny: ^
[2022-06-12T20:01:32+0100] <@gyakovlev> dionysos: you omitted the second part of that saying ;-)
[2022-06-12T20:01:31+0100] <@sam_> dionysos: maybe /nick dilfridge for log
[2022-06-12T20:02:06+0100] dionysos is now known as dilfridge
[2022-06-12T20:02:06+0100] <@sam_> <3
[2022-06-12T20:02:10+0100] • dilfridge: here
[2022-06-12T20:02:41+0100] <@sam_> we'll give mgorny until 5 past then crack on, he said he's had a few issues with pain today 
[2022-06-12T20:02:54+0100] <@sam_> can wait longer if that's appropriate though. Only second time chairing :)
[2022-06-12T20:03:05+0100] <+sultan> maybe one of his cats joins shortly :p
[2022-06-12T20:03:23+0100] <@dilfridge> cat > /dev/council
[2022-06-12T20:03:39+0100] <@gyakovlev> I'd totally vote for cats in council though
[2022-06-12T20:03:50+0100] <@dilfridge> you need to nominate one then!
[2022-06-12T20:04:08+0100] <@gyakovlev> I can even nominate 3
[2022-06-12T20:04:14+0100] <@dilfridge> meow
[2022-06-12T20:04:39+0100] <@gyakovlev> but it'd be unfair to nominate only mgorny's 3 cats. will nominate mattst88's cat as well.
[2022-06-12T20:04:59+0100] <@mattst88> hah, my cat will only accept if she gets treats as compensation
[2022-06-12T20:05:12+0100] <@sam_> alrighty, we'll crack on, and hopefully mgorny can join us in a bit
[2022-06-12T20:05:20+0100] <@sam_> 2. Approval of GLEP 68 update for language tags change (https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/0d0ea85d6b1efe334124154fa9956e93)
[2022-06-12T20:05:29+0100] <@sam_> this is IMO pretty straightforward
[2022-06-12T20:05:41+0100] <@sam_> it's ulm's motion so I'll let him summarise
[2022-06-12T20:06:04+0100] <@ulm> it's all in the commit message
[2022-06-12T20:06:28+0100] <@ulm> basically will allow things like lang="pt-BR" in package and category metadata
[2022-06-12T20:06:40+0100] <@mattst88> yeah, seems like an obvious and good change
[2022-06-12T20:06:39+0100] <@sam_> it is, I dare say, a no-brainer
[2022-06-12T20:07:01+0100] <@sam_> any questions? concerns? 
[2022-06-12T20:08:03+0100] <@sam_> motion: Approval of GLEP 68 update for language tags change
[2022-06-12T20:08:07+0100] <@mattst88> nope, let's vote
[2022-06-12T20:08:08+0100] • sam_: yes
[2022-06-12T20:08:14+0100] • mattst88: yes
[2022-06-12T20:08:22+0100] • Marecki: yes
[2022-06-12T20:08:38+0100] • gyakovlev: yes
[2022-06-12T20:09:03+0100] • dilfridge: yes
[2022-06-12T20:09:08+0100] • ulm: yes
[2022-06-12T20:09:12+0100] <@ulm> thank you
[2022-06-12T20:09:24+0100] <@sam_> great, 6 yes, 1 abstention (not present in meeting), 0 no
[2022-06-12T20:09:31+0100] <@sam_>  
[2022-06-12T20:09:33+0100] <@sam_> 3. Regular arch status review ("arch team health check") (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council#Arch-status_Reviews)
[2022-06-12T20:09:48+0100] <@sam_> "The Council periodically reviews the activity of architecture-related activities, most notably but not exclusively the turnaround time of keywording/stabilisation requests. This takes place during June and December meetings, with additional sessions if required."
[2022-06-12T20:09:59+0100] <@sam_> https://www.akhuettel.de/gentoo-bugs/arches.php
[2022-06-12T20:10:16+0100] <@sam_> I'm not aware of any specific complaints with this at the moment
[2022-06-12T20:10:27+0100] <@sam_> mattst88 recently dropped alpha back to exp because of issues w/ python keywording
[2022-06-12T20:10:37+0100] <@sam_> that would've been the only thing I'd have raised
[2022-06-12T20:10:47+0100] <@gyakovlev> mattst88 dropped alpha to -exp I think
[2022-06-12T20:11:03+0100] <@dilfridge> that recent spike in bugs for all arches, is that stabilization?
[2022-06-12T20:11:06+0100] <@mattst88> I'd say everything looks rather healthy
[2022-06-12T20:11:19+0100] <@Marecki> What's that spike visible across all arches?
[2022-06-12T20:11:21+0100] <@gyakovlev> also we need mgorny on that topic, python stablereqs are like a canary for arch issues.
[2022-06-12T20:11:23+0100] <+arthurzam> dilfridge: Yes, huge stablereq filing yesterday
[2022-06-12T20:11:19+0100] <@sam_> yeah, I think it's mgorny filing a bunch of python bugs
[2022-06-12T20:11:30+0100] <@Marecki> Stable ones, I mean
[2022-06-12T20:11:39+0100] <@sam_> but yeah, definitely gyakovlev 
[2022-06-12T20:12:03+0100] <@sam_> I think we're all fine there for now
[2022-06-12T20:12:08+0100] <@dilfridge> looks all good to me
[2022-06-12T20:12:19+0100] • dilfridge: needs to add loong to the page
[2022-06-12T20:12:18+0100] <@sam_> oh yes
[2022-06-12T20:12:25+0100] <@Marecki> Slightly concerned about mips... No trend either way.
[2022-06-12T20:12:32+0100] <@mattst88> mips is exp
[2022-06-12T20:12:38+0100] <@dilfridge> any exp arch is bad
[2022-06-12T20:12:38+0100] <@sam_> xen0n is going to be working on mips when his loong stuff is less busy too
[2022-06-12T20:13:01+0100] <@dilfridge> so let's try to get stuff to stable, even if that means dropping keywords on a lot of software
[2022-06-12T20:12:59+0100] <@sam_> so I'm not too worried about it, but yeah, exp is somewhat a vicious spiral
[2022-06-12T20:13:08+0100] <@sam_> yeah, we recently got s390 (dilfridge and I) back to stable and it helped a lot 
[2022-06-12T20:13:21+0100] <@dilfridge> s390 was relatively easy because it's server based
[2022-06-12T20:13:28+0100] <@dilfridge> mips would need a lot more work
[2022-06-12T20:13:26+0100] <@sam_> mips is going to need a rather vicious set of culling
[2022-06-12T20:13:47+0100] <@sam_> alright, nothing for us to do here then
[2022-06-12T20:13:56+0100] <@mattst88> agreed
[2022-06-12T20:13:52+0100] <@sam_>  
[2022-06-12T20:14:07+0100] <@sam_> 4. Open bugs with council participation
[2022-06-12T20:14:15+0100] <@sam_> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&email2=council%40gentoo.org&emailassigned_to2=1&emailcc2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&list_id=6260441&query_format=advanced
[2022-06-12T20:14:22+0100] • dilfridge: is suddenly busy elsewhere
[2022-06-12T20:14:22+0100] <@sam_> lol
[2022-06-12T20:14:23+0100] <@sam_>  
[2022-06-12T20:14:26+0100] <@sam_> bug 834997
[2022-06-12T20:14:31+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/834997 "Missing summaries for 20211114 and 20211212 council meetings"; Gentoo Council, unspecified; CONF; ulm:dilfridge
[2022-06-12T20:14:30+0100] • sam_: glares at dilfridge 
[2022-06-12T20:14:42+0100] • dilfridge: glares... elsewhere
[2022-06-12T20:14:49+0100] <@dilfridge> i will
[2022-06-12T20:14:59+0100] <@sam_> we also have some logs missing from 2022-03-13
[2022-06-12T20:15:03+0100] <@gyakovlev> I'm writing april one right now, will send today.
[2022-06-12T20:15:07+0100] <@sam_> (see https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Meeting_logs)
[2022-06-12T20:15:16+0100] <@sam_> brilliant, thanks, i sent draft for may earlier too
[2022-06-12T20:15:24+0100] <@mattst88> I think one recent meeting is waiting on me
[2022-06-12T20:15:31+0100] <@dilfridge> i should have the complete backlog
[2022-06-12T20:15:45+0100] <@sam_> everyone seems to know what they need to do then
[2022-06-12T20:15:59+0100] <@sam_> bug 835165
[2022-06-12T20:16:04+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/835165 "Reimbursement for SSD purchase for Infra 3/14/2022"; Gentoo Foundation, Reimbursements; CONF; antarus:trustees
[2022-06-12T20:16:04+0100] <@sam_> we're done on that, so I'll drop us from CC
[2022-06-12T20:16:19+0100] <@sam_>  
[2022-06-12T20:16:20+0100] <@sam_> bug 835152
[2022-06-12T20:16:25+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/835152 "Mirror pkgcore/* repos from github"; Gentoo Infrastructure, Git; CONF; sam:infra-bugs
[2022-06-12T20:16:30+0100] <@sam_> while this is of interest to us, we can't do anything right now about it as council
[2022-06-12T20:16:35+0100] <@sam_> someone should let us know if they feel we need to look into it
[2022-06-12T20:16:40+0100] <@sam_> so i'd propose dropping us again there too
[2022-06-12T20:16:58+0100] <@ulm> wfm
[2022-06-12T20:17:03+0100] <@sam_>  
[2022-06-12T20:17:04+0100] <@sam_> bug 176186
[2022-06-12T20:17:09+0100] <willikins> sam_: https://bugs.gentoo.org/176186 "Gentoo projects file hosting"; Gentoo Infrastructure, Other; IN_P; dsd:infra-bugs
[2022-06-12T20:17:10+0100] <+arthurzam> Um, does https://gitlab.gentoo.org/pkgcore count as done?
[2022-06-12T20:17:08+0100] <@sam_> ditto, IMO. 
[2022-06-12T20:17:22+0100] <@sam_> arthurzam: it might do, actually, I wasn't sure if that was considered stable yet
[2022-06-12T20:17:40+0100] <@sam_> but I think that's something we could talk about if it became an issue
[2022-06-12T20:17:52+0100] <+arthurzam> OK, thanks
[2022-06-12T20:17:51+0100] <@sam_> or if we abandoned gitlab efforts, etc
[2022-06-12T20:18:00+0100] <@sam_> just want to avoid us having to look at these every month
[2022-06-12T20:18:08+0100] <@sam_> doesn't mean we don't care about the issues per se, people are free to loop us in if we need to look at it
[2022-06-12T20:18:21+0100] <@sam_>  
[2022-06-12T20:18:28+0100] <@sam_> 5. Open floor
[2022-06-12T20:18:31+0100] <@sam_> Anything? :)
[2022-06-12T20:19:51+0100] <@Marecki> Not a critical thing but - how is the server upgrade coming along?
[2022-06-12T20:20:12+0100] <@sam_> I'm hoping antarus is back but not sure
[2022-06-12T20:20:35+0100] <@sam_> At last check, I know that killdeer was at least physically racked, but not yet fully set up
[2022-06-12T20:20:38+0100] <@sam_> (that's box #1)
[2022-06-12T20:20:46+0100] <@sam_> I don't know about box #2, or if it arrived yet even
[2022-06-12T20:20:55+0100] <@sam_> definitely a fair question though
[2022-06-12T20:21:16+0100] <@mgorny> sorry
[2022-06-12T20:21:17+0100] <+ajak> yeah, at least one of the servers is usable but not seen any work to get it to production ready yet
[2022-06-12T20:21:20+0100] <@sam_> I can always add in an answer if we get one from antarus or robbat2 later and make it clear it was post-meeting
[2022-06-12T20:21:25+0100] <@sam_> in the summary, that is
[2022-06-12T20:21:33+0100] <@sam_> alright, anything else?
[2022-06-12T20:21:40+0100] <@mgorny> things got delayed a little bit here ;-/
[2022-06-12T20:22:06+0100] <@Marecki> Some sort of official status update would be nice... Not at the cost of the actual work, of course.
[2022-06-12T20:22:17+0100] <@sam_> yeah, I think that's a fair request
[2022-06-12T20:22:40+0100] <@sam_> we could do it by email or bug, would you mind handling it? 
[2022-06-12T20:22:45+0100] <@mgorny> as for arches, i don't have any major issues right now
[2022-06-12T20:22:58+0100] <@mgorny> alpha was the only pain, and it's exp now, so not a problem anymore
[2022-06-12T20:23:49+0100] <@sam_> yep
[2022-06-12T20:23:50+0100] <@sam_> alright
[2022-06-12T20:24:01+0100] <@mattst88> mgorny: do we have any updates on joining an umbrella?
[2022-06-12T20:24:12+0100] <@mgorny> good one
[2022-06-12T20:24:18+0100] <@mattst88> it appears that no progress has been made by the trustees
[2022-06-12T20:24:35+0100] <@dilfridge> :)
[2022-06-12T20:24:37+0100] <@sam_> I'm not really clear on what that's even waiting on
[2022-06-12T20:24:43+0100] <@sam_> Is it "just" deciding what to go for?
[2022-06-12T20:24:52+0100] <@mattst88> someone to do something, I think
[2022-06-12T20:24:55+0100] <@mgorny> the only thing that happened is that sfconservancy has officially closed our request
[2022-06-12T20:25:05+0100] <@dilfridge> on somebody to feel entitled to do it and to do it
[2022-06-12T20:25:26+0100] <@mattst88> ISTR the president saying he was going to do stuff this time around
[2022-06-12T20:25:42+0100] <@dilfridge> make gentoo great again?
[2022-06-12T20:25:42+0100] <@sam_> feels like we end up in a cycle where it gets too close to a trustees election every time, then everyone talks about joining an umbrella beforehand, then distracted, then ...
[2022-06-12T20:25:50+0100] <@mattst88> but I think it's time for another trustees election already?
[2022-06-12T20:26:24+0100] <@dilfridge> yes, after council
[2022-06-12T20:26:55+0100] <@sam_> alrighty
[2022-06-12T20:26:57+0100] <@sam_> I think we're done 
[2022-06-12T20:27:11+0100] <@mattst88> yep
[2022-06-12T20:27:10+0100] • sam_: bangs meeting gavel