| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As per upstream ChangeLog for 0.18.3.
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Drop vulnerable versions
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575122
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575118
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Bump to EAPI=6
* Bump to nextgen readme.gentoo eclass
* Try to break lines at 80 chars
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Bump to EAPI=6
* Try to wrap lines at 80 chars
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a dependency on www-servers/adsf to allow the
"nanoc view" command to work as intended.
Thanks for Nick Bowler in bug 572938 for the suggestion.
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
New dependency for www-apps/nanoc, bug 572938
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27_p64
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27_p64
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
Pull request: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/880
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Pull request: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/877
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Changes:
* Bumped to upstream v3.1p1 (Closes #572004)
* Bumped to EAPI=6
* Added ewarn to tell user that they maybe have to install a custom UDEV
rule (Closes #315935)
* Various runscript fixes
- Services were misusing "need net" (See #439092)
- start_pre added to fix problems caused by non-existing pidfile dir
(Closes #553418)
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
problem was seen in hardened system && using USE="-system-seabios"
Gentoo-bug: 569810
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
while bumping ovmf, I found current logic not
handling USE=ovmf enabled && ${OVMF_VER} is unset case
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Reported-by: Andrey Golovizin
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/574866
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This drops the only stable version but nothing requires it and it's
blocking the removal of Java 6.
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Patching build.xml was annoying. This version isn't limited to Java
6. Nothing currently requires it but it's well-maintained and looks
useful.
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|